Would you mind sharing what you received? The blur on my new 2.3 is terrible and I'm about to ask for a refund. It's worth it if you like punchy, HDR-like images. You have to lose the dramatic look to gain back sharpness and detail.Īcutally, support stepped in and offered a workaround and eventually an update and it seems fine now. I see improvements in some ways but photos come out really soft at the default settings. I just upgraded to 2.3 and it's doing a terrible job of retaining sharpness and detail. Some of the above may change with the 2.3 version if I ever get to test it.the beta is closed now, so maybe a production release is imminent. Having said that, it does do a decent job even on it's own (usually) and therefore can be leveraged in batch mode to save time over hand-edits if dealing with large numbers of files. So, again, your hand edit looks more natural (to me) and I might do a local edit there before sending to PL (depending on how picky I wanted to be).Īfter experimenting a while in my work-flow I eventually put PL last in the chain (originally started with first) after hand-editing to see if it could tweak out some improvements more often than not it does. In your model test photo.while the increased exposure did bring out some differentiation to the dark clothes on the legs it also seemed to over-exposure the skin tones on the right hand. Skies are sometimes made overly blue, but usually do a good job and can be adjusted. And the recalled "update" seemed to turn that up to "eleven" ie even more so. PL processed landscapes are sometimes on the border of over-sharpened imo, as in your test case, compared to your hand edit.I usually decrease the opacity slider by roughly 50% on many PL processed photos. Subsequently, I have had no news from the company and I just learned, due to this thread, that they have been acquired by Skylum (Luminar) and are set to release v2.3 soon. I reported a few bugs with one v2.2.x update that were acked and then that version was recalled. There was a flash so I wonder if there is a basis for this decision that it detected in the light pattern on her body? What do you guys think of this performance from Photolemur? It seems to mainly apply vibrance to this photo but it does also adjust the light in some odd areas like on her right hand and leg. The edit with Photolemur's output as the base: In this case I started with the SOOC and ran it through Photolemur then inserted it into the layer stack I had previously constructed for the photo while also performing quick and dirty frequency separation on Photolemur's version. Overall I think it's ok though far from a perfect end result. It likes to throw vibrance on photos of people which seems kind of predictable. I look at it as getting a different starting point for editing. It's supposed to be an AI powered photo editing program. All that smartphone photography you're producing? Photolemur makes it a snap to make picture-perfect edits in just a click on your computer.I just got it for $35, it seems to work ok. Editing photos in external software takes time, Photolemur ensures you don't have to lose a photo because you don't have the time to enhance it. The world's first automated photo enhancement solution for Mac and Windows, Photolemur uses image recognition, artificial intelligence, and a little bit of real-world magic to effortless edit photos into a new realm of glory.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |